Topic

IVF= Invitero fertilization, but l also mean any other forms of artificial pregnancy including the use of fertility drugs.

Birth control pills and are equal to abortion in this particular argument.In short, there are two sides of the fence for this debate; preventing pregnancy and forcing pregnancy.

 

In a debate, how would you argue abortion is equal to IVF in terms of taking fate into your own hands

One stops life in a manner rather artificial, the other starts life in manner rather artificial.

 

In a debate, how would you argue abortion is equal to IVF in terms of taking fate into your own hands

In short, no. IVF is only forcing pregnancy if it is against the woman is will. Then it becomes the equivalent of rape. The only thing that abortion and IVF have in common is that they are both unnatural. The term 'assisting pregnancy' would be more accurate. You take your fate into your own hands ever day by just getting out of bed in the morning.

 

In a debate, how would you argue abortion is equal to IVF in terms of taking fate into your own hands

of all abortion humanity made human life abortion is ''crime against itself''. All successful invention or discovery we have in sciences r agustment to what nature gave us, or energy multiplication, it is not abortion or life creation. I wonder why developed countries invest billions of dallar to research to create life while aborting what is created naturally. It is a game. May be they do that keep food or resources ready always to them denying the food of other who r selected for abortion in Africa or elsewhere.The concept abort in reference to humanity is ''devilish it is different from prevention. Prevention is for things not to be united, while abortion is done on united cells. But the intent of the preventor also matter!

 

In a debate, how would you argue abortion is equal to IVF in terms of taking fate into your own hands

I personally believe that every time a doctor saves a live, they r playing God. This is true when u r preventing pregnancies, ending pregnancies or artificially causing one. I think most people would agree. The people that have a problem with any of these r usually the religious type who would rather follow what the church says instead of looking at logic. If a person is willing to create life, they should be just as open to taking that of an unborn child. For the record, I believe that if humans can medically do these things, & no living person is getting hurt, then they should be aloud.